Supporting Documentation · Sep 17, 2026
Grossman Steck September 4
5b03db00f0d37d37aa87785f553cfbffd80473fe95174f579ab46284a2fd5520Indexed text
Peter G. Steck Community Planning Consultant 80 Maplewood Avenue, Maplewood, New Jersey 07040-1252 (973) 762-6568 Steckplan@gmail.com September 4, 2026 PLANNING EVALUATION RE: Max Grossman Board of Adjustment Application ZB 26-01 Block 146, Lot 72 15 Alan Street Township of West Orange Introduction Max Grossman and his wife reside in the single-family dwelling at 15 Alan Street. He is seeking approval from the Board of Adjustment to expand his free-standing garage in the rear of the property by increasing the “footprint” 8 feet further to the front and by adding a second level under a gambrel roof with a dormer. The purpose of the expansion is to better accommodate his existing accessory woodworking hobby and home occupation and to accommodate this personal pickup truck. (Mr. Grossman has been the woodshop teacher at West Orange High School for the last 11 years.) Because the proposed expansion involves variances from the dimensional standards for an accessory structure as well as home occupation standards, Mr. Grossman is seeking both a “use” variance and dimensional variances. This Planning Evaluation has been prepared on behalf of Mr. Grossman. It concludes that the statutory proofs are present that warrant approval of the requested variances. This Planning Evaluation is being provided in advance of planning testimony anticipated to be presented on September 17, 2026. Description of Existing Conditions Lot 72 in Block 146 is a 40.00 foot by 119.62 foot rectangular lot with an area of 4,784.8 square feet. It is situated on the north side of Alan Street, one lot in from the intersection with Valley Way. The lot contains a small single-family dwelling and a free- standing two-car garage as shown on Plate I. The garage has a side setback of 5.13 feet and a rear setback of 4.65 feet with a further intrusion into the rear setback built by the prior owner. Without the small rear addition, the existing garage has dimensions of 18.74 feet in width by 19.18 feet in depth. Description of Existing Use As previously indicated, Mr. Grossman is a woodshop teacher at West Orange High School. He uses his woodworking skills at home for his own enjoyment and as an accessory home occupation. In his garage he creates unique pieces of furniture, repairs furniture, and crafts other wood items such as toys and kitchen utensils for his own use and for sale. He has been engaged in
e occupation. In his garage he creates unique pieces of furniture, repairs furniture, and crafts other wood items such as toys and kitchen utensils for his own use and for sale. He has been engaged in this activity since 2018 with no signage and with no adverse comments from anyone in the area.
-2- PLATE I EXISTING CONDITIONS Description of Proposed Development Because of the limited depth of the existing garage, Mr. Grossman cannot store his pickup truck inside. However, his prime motivation for a second level is to shift some of his woodworking and metal fittings equipment to that upper level to free-up space on the ground floor to handle larger projects such as the creation of a dining room table. To accommodate these needs, he is applying to expand the garage 8 feet to the front and add a second level under a gambrel roof with a side shed dormer as shown on Plate II. Because of the integrity of the existing structure, the first floor walls will need to be reconstructed on the existing foundation with a new foundation constructed to support the 8 foot front extension. The small rear addition is being removed. PLATE II RENDERING OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
-3- According to the Zoning Officer, the proposal involves possibly one “d” or “use” variance related to where the home occupation is located and several dimensional or “c” variances as described below: §25-9.9.b. Home occupations are required to be within the principal building and the applicant is proposing the woodworking use in his freestanding garage. §25-8.1(f) An accessory building is limited to 1½ stories and 15 feet and the gambrel roof addition results in a second story and a height of 20.6 feet. Also, an accessory building is limited to a maximum coverage of 1/3 of the required rear yard (1/3 x 1,200 sq. ft. = 400 sq. ft.) and the proposed expanded footprint of 499 sq. ft. covers 42% of the required rear yard. §25-8.1 A 5 foot minimum rear setback for accessory buildings is required and the existing setback (after rear addition is removed) is only 4.65 feet. §25-7.1 A maximum (impervious) lot coverage of 55% is permitted and the applicant is reducing the existing coverage from 61.5% to only 60.6%. §25-8.2(c) A roof overhang can project a maximum of 2.0 feet, and the proposed front overhang projects 3.92 feet (although not into a required yard). Description of the Surrounding Area The subject property is located in a primarily residential area having one and two- family dwellings as generally depicted on the Existing Land Use Map in the 2019 Land Use Plan as shown on Plate III. (This Master Plan map does not distinguish between one and two-family dwellings.) The abutting dwelling to the west at the corner is a three-family dwelling. The Vanderhoof & Sons charter bus facility is also located to the northeast on Wilfred Street. PLATE III GENERAL EXISTING LAND USE PATTERN
-4- Plate IV is a drone photo that shows the relationship of the subject property to the adjacent properties. In the immediate area, the subject garage is flanked by other garages and sheds. As shown on Plate I on page 2, one of the garages to the rear has a height and style similar to that proposed by the applicant. PLATE IV ADJACENT PROPERTIES Zoning Considerations The subject property is in the R-T Zone as shown on Plate V which allows one- family dwellings on 5,000 square foot lots with a 50 foot width. Two-family dwellings are permitted on 7,500 square foot lots with a 75 foot width. The two-family homes in the neighborhood are typically on nonconforming lots. The subject lot with a 40 foot width and an area of 4,784.8 square feet is an existing non-conforming lot.
-5- PLATE V PORTION OF ZONING MAP The Ordinance has a specific definition of a home occupation and regulations for such accessory uses as noted below. Craft making is one of the uses specifically identified as a permissible home occupation. An accessory use is defined as a “use naturally and normally incident and subordinate to the principal use of the premises or lot.”
-6- It is noted that there is a difference between the nature of the relief needed as identified by the West Orange Zoning Officer (who indicates that a “use” variance is needed along with dimensional variances) and planning consultant Malvika Apte in her May 19, 2026 Completeness / Planning Review #2 (who does not identify a “use” variance, but only dimensional variances). In N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70. of the Municipal Land Use Law, a “use” or “d(1)” is limited to a request for a principal use or structure as noted below: d. In particular cases for special reasons, grant a variance to allow departure from pursuant to article 8 of this act to permit: (1) a use or principal structure restricted such use or principal structure. Consequently, if the Board of Adjustment interprets the applicant’s variance request for an accessory use and accessory structure, the application necessitates only “c” or dimensional variances and no “d” or “use” variance is required. However, according to the West Orange Zoning Officer, a “d” or “use” variance is required. Master Plan Considerations – 2019 Master Plan Update The 2019 Master Plan Update endorsed the current R-T Zone that applies to the subject property. No specific comments or recommendations were offered with respect to home occupations. Among the goals was to improve and maintain residential neighborhoods by encouraging the rehabilitation of existing dwellings and new residential construction at suitable densities. Planning rationale supporting variance approval In advance of planning testimony to be presented at an upcoming Board of Adjustment hearing, several comments are offered below. Assuming the Board of Adjustment concludes that a “d” or “use” variance is involved, the applicant must demonstrate special reasons, particular suitability, and satisfy the negative criteria under the “enhanced quality of proof” standard established by the Medici Decision and view the dimensional requests as subsumed by the “use” variance request. If the Board concludes that only “c” or dimensional variances are involved, then a rationale is advanced that the benefits of granting the variances substantially outweigh any potential detriments. Not a full-time occupation Initially it is observed that the home occupation regulations in §25.9.9 appear to be intended for a homeowner engaging in the home occupation as his or her
tial detriments. Not a full-time occupation Initially it is observed that the home occupation regulations in §25.9.9 appear to be intended for a homeowner engaging in the home occupation as his or her principal occupation as opposed to a part time activity. Mr. Grossman’s full time occupation is as the woodshop teacher in West Orange High School. Consequently, the home occupation sought by Mr. Grossman is necessarily diminished in scale. Woodworking is a traditional home-based activity Woodworking is a traditional accessory home-based activity that occurs in single- family basements and in garages. , the handling, sawing, planing, joining, and finishing of wood and incidental metal fittings is not an unusual activity occurring in the single-family residences and can comfortably be considered as craft making.
-7- There are unusual aspects of the proposed activity The applicant, because of his expertise and personal interest, essentially engages in the same type of activities as craft making but occasionally handles larger projects such as a dining room table which requires more space than can typically be accommodated within a small single-family dwelling. Reconstructing the garage has benefits To accommodate his part time activity, the applicant intends to improve his garage space to handle both the woodworking activity as well as the interior storage of his pickup truck. Although it is often that garages fall into disrepair before the home itself does because of the less stringent construction standards in the 1920’s and 1930’s for garages, the applicant is proposing a context-sensitive design that fits within the area and masks the second level as being under a gambrel roof appearing to be 1½ stories. (The applicant is also a member of the West Orange Historic Preservation Commission.) The renovations include a header on the right side of the garage so that a second overhead door can be installed by the current or a future homeowner who desires a two-vehicle garage. As special reasons, several Municipal Land Use Law purposes are advanced. Approval of the application would advance the following purposes of the MLUL found in N.J.S.A. 40:5D-2: b. To secure safety from fire, flood, panic and other natural and man-made disasters. The reconstructed garage will result in an upgrade to current building codes and remove a rear section that is only 10 inches from the rear property line. g. To provide sufficient space in appropriate locations for a variety of agricultural, residential, recreational, commercial and industrial uses and open space, both public and private, according to their respective environmental requirements in order to meet the needs of all New Jersey citizens. The reconstructed garage is in a location that is not fully visible from Alan Street and is situated in a cluster of garages and scheds which render the proposed garage as a structure visually compatible to these other structures. i. To promote a desirable visual environment through creative development techniques and good civic design and arrangement. The proposed design is an aesthetic improvement in itself and, additionally, is designed to accommodate the applicant’s pick-up truck. The
development techniques and good civic design and arrangement. The proposed design is an aesthetic improvement in itself and, additionally, is designed to accommodate the applicant’s pick-up truck. The reconstructed garage is particularly suited to the property The applicant will continue to use the principal building as a single-family dwelling in the neighborhood that has a fair incidence of two-family dwellings and in a zone that allows both one and two-family dwellings. The location of the subject garage in a cluster of sheds and garages makes the property particularly suited for the proposed garage enlargement.
File revisions (1)
- Sep 29, 2026
5b03db00f0d33,612,613 bytes