138-24 Exhibit to Resolution Adopting the Township of West Orange Vision Zero Action Plan.pdf

ld Ac e adem l y El m St Ch er Ave ry St Ave sey k Ter Colg RECOMMENDED PROVEN SAFETY klin ate ittle I Par dle k n M id COUNTERMEASURES** Wh on Fra E d is o l o ve et Sch R idg ng A Stre Ave W eA t hS illi ve • High-visibility

illi ve • High-visibility crosswalks: 40% reduction chu Main am son Mt P Hig leas ant in pedestrian injury crashes St Wat Aven u e • Intersection lighting: 42% reduction Wat ton hing in pedestrian crashes Was ool S c h Wa • Advance yield or stop markings and signs: Mou sh ing n Guild t Carme ton 25% reduction in pedestrian crashes St St Acad l emy de St ea

de St ea El ia • 4-lane to 3-lane road diet conversion: M m mb St 19-47% reduction in total crashes Ch lu Co er ve ry ey A St ve • Sidewalks: 16-89% reduction in crashes involving nA k Ter Colg pedestrians walking along roadways s ate ittle I nkli Par e dle k Av id on M

Par e dle k Av id on M Wh • Paved Shoulders: 71% reduction in crashes Fra Edis hool Inte nd ve Sc Ri involving pedestrians walking along roadways hla dg hA rsta Ave ve W eA t As hS dis illi ve te 2 ng A am • A driver traveling at 30 miles per hour who son an Hig 0 8 St St hits a pedestrian has a 45 percent chance of chu Wat Park

hits a pedestrian has a 45 percent chance of chu Wat Park killing or seriously injuring them. At 20 miles Wat ton hing Mt Was ool Plea per hour, that percentage drops to 5 percent. S c h san Wa t Ave sh nu e Mou ing ton n Guild t Carme • 15% reduction in total crashes Bren St St Acad l de emy St nan D • Very low cost ea bia El M Laird D m lum rive

Laird D m lum rive St Ch Co • Added Left-Turn Lanes: 28-48% rive er Ave ry St reduction in total crashes ve sey nA k Ter Colg ate • Positive Offset Left-Turn Lanes: 36% ittle I e nkli P le ark Av M id d reduction in fatal and injury crashes Wh n Fra o nd Edis hool ve Sc R hla hA idg • Right-Turn Lanes: 14-26% reduction in total crashes

hA idg • Right-Turn Lanes: 14-26% reduction in total crashes ve ve W As eA t d is hS d nA illi ve ng A Roa an am • Cost varies Hig so St ide St chu Wat Park oks ace • Signalized Intersection to Roundabout: 78% Wat Bro ton h Pl

Wat Bro ton h Pl hing reduction in fatal and injury crashes Was ool dolp Sch Wa Mt Ple Ran sh ing asa ton nt A St ven *Includes cost of roundabouts and cost of countermeasures that St u e overlap with intersecting corridors. Roundabouts are subject to de ea et St MStre additional feasibility and cost studies, and estimates do not account bia View for Right-of-Way acquisition. Estimated cost does not include lum

for Right-of-Way acquisition. Estimated cost does not include lum lighting improvements (additional studies are recommended). Cost Co Mt estimates are primarily based on the NJDOT 2022 cost estimate Estimated guidelines for safe routes. https://www.saferoutesnj.org/wp-content/ uploads/2022/05/Design-Treatment-Estimating-Guidelines.pdf e Av Construction Cost: nd ve **Although not specifically a Proven Safety Countermeasure, traffic hla hA signal timing update/optimization should be included as part of Road As dis Diet/Reconfiguration, Left- and Right-Turn Lanes, Leading Pedestrian an ~$600,000* St Intervals, and Protected-Only Left Turn Signal Phasing alternatives. Park WEST ORANGE TOWNSHIP: VISION ZERO ACTION PLAN 93