Town CrierWest Orange, New Jersey
← Back to search

Supporting Documentation · May 28, 2026

Prior Resolutions of Approval submission

Preserved file SHA-256bb31006bbb79f35f308cc95608510940a3a996a02195a8c6f317b79cef192b40

Indexed text

Page 80

3. A “C” variance for two (2) free standing signs which have been revised for size and color. 4. Amended final site plan approval subject to the conditions and provisions stated below. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant of said variances and preliminary and final site plan approval shall be conditioned upon the Applicant’s full and complete satisfaction of the following conditions: 1. All conditions of the prior approvals as set forth in the initial approval dated December 16, 2010, as amended by Resolution 2ZB-08-37 dated January 17, 2013, as further amended by Resolution ZB-15-03 dated April 16, 2015, with the exception of 1, 6-13, 17, 19, 21, 25, 28, 30, 31a, 31d, 31£-31m, 43, 44, 50-52 and 60, which are moot. 2. All conditions stated in the Memorandum of Bowman Consulting dated July 14, 2016, attached hereto and made part of this Resolution, are to be complied with by the Applicant. 3. The Applicant will revise the existing Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Manual for the water quality facility, deleting the rain garden and adding the manufactured treatment device. This document is to be recorded superseding the previously recorded 04M 11

Page 81

Manual. - The Applicant will straighten out the painted median of the entrance drive to be perpendicular to Prospect Avenue. - The Applicant will perform a video inspection of the sanitary sewer line into which it is tapping from its current terminus on the Shillelagh Club to the manhole in Prospect Avenue. The video inspection and associated report are to be provided to the Board and Township Engineers for review. Should this inspection find any deficiencies in the existing pipe corrective actions are to be implemented. . The area by the football bleachers will be re- Graded in a manner which does not disturb the existing trees to be preserved. - The millings of the old track will be disposed of off-site in accordance with applicable regulations and will not be re-used on site. Construction vehicles shall not be permitted to travel over the cross-country track near and within the natural buffer. 12

Page 82

9, There shall be no playing of amplified music during baseball practice, however, the applicant shall be permitted to play the Star Spangled Banner at the beginning of Varsity baseball games and music for one and one half minutes between innings at Varsity baseball games, at normal and customary decibel levels. 10. The proposed signs at the site driveways are not To be illuminated. Moved: Neuer Seconded: Schwarzbaum Those in Favor: 6 Those Opposed: 0 Abstentions: Q I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was adopted by the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of West Orange at its meeting of August 18, 2016 and that said Resolution memorializes the action of the Board taken at its meeting held on July 21, 2016 granting the application by the votes as stated above. 13

Page 83

Adopted: August 18, 2016 14 fU¢ babe. Lafe Rose DeSena Board Secretary

Page 84

FINAL — V1 —SKW — 10.18.23 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT TOWNSHIP OF WEST ORANGE SETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL Block: 82.01 - Lot: 1 700 Prospect Avenue, West Orange Case No. ZB-22-12 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, SETON HALL PREPARATORY SCHOOL (the "Applicant" or “Seton Hall”) has applied to the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Township of West Orange (the "Board"), for amended final site plan approval and the following variance relief, in connection with its proposal to (i) construct an addition to an existing building and (ii) change the occupancy of another building, on property located within the R-1 (Residential) Zone, identified as Lot 1 within Block 82.01 on the Official Tax Map of the Township of West Orange, more commonly known as 700 Prospect Avenue, West Orange (the "Property" or the "Site"): A variance pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d)(2) (a "(d)(2) expansion of a preexisting nonconforming use variance"), to permit the expansion of the use of the athletic complex on the Property by way of the proposed addition, whereas the Applicant obtained prior approvals from the Board permitting the athletic complex use which use is not permitted in the R-1 Zone, pursuant to Section 25-7.1 of the Township of West Orange Land Use Regulations Ordinance (the "Ordinance"); and WHEREAS, public hearings, on notice, were held on such application on June 22, and September 28, 2023, at which time interested citizens were afforded an opportunity to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the Board, after carefully considering the evidence presented by the Applicant and the reports from consultants and reviewing agencies, has made the following factual findings and conclusions: 1. The Board reviewed the application and deemed it to be complete.

Page 85

FINAL — V1 —SKW - 10.18.23 2. Board Member Eben recused himself from the proceedings upon advice from the Board's Attorney. 3. The Property consists of a single 44.5-acre lot, located on, and fronting, the east side of Prospect Avenue, north of Northfield Avenue. The lot also fronts Ridge Road to the north and east. The Property constitutes the athletic complex of the Seton Hall Preparatory School and is accordingly improved with athletic fields, tennis courts, paved parking areas, a multitude of detached outbuildings, field houses, and other associated improvements. Surrounding land uses include single- and multi-family residences, religious institutions, private clubs, and commercial, industrial, office, and open space. 4. The Applicant proposes to construct a two (2) story addition to an existing one- story building that presently functions as a maintenance and storage space (the "existing maintenance/storage building"). Following the proposed addition, this building would feature a fitness room, offices, restrooms, a machine room, and a janitor’s closet on the first floor, and a training area, office, storage rooms, restrooms, balcony, and a janitor’s closet on the second floor (the "proposed fitness center"). Additionally, the Applicant proposes to replace the functions of the existing maintenance/storage building through the conversion and use of one of the existing field houses, particularly the 6.630 square-foot field house building situated on the south side of the Property (the "southern field house") for these purposes. 5. A public or private school is a conditionally permitted use in the R-1 (single family residential) Zone, but school athletic fields are not a principal permitted use in the R-1 Zone. As such, the Applicant received use variance relief from the Board, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D- 70(d)(1), to permit the existing athletic complex use on the Property. Such relief is memorialized by way of Resolutions first adopted by the Board on December 16, 2010, and subsequently on

Page 86

FINAL — V1 —SKW — 10.18.23 January 17, 2013 following a "Whispering Woods" hearing on the matter, under Application No. ZB-08-37 (the "2010 Approval"). The Applicant also received (d)(2) expansion of use variance relief from the Board under Application Nos. ZB-15-03 and ZB-16-05, respectively memorialized by way of Resolutions adopted on April 16, 2015, and August 18, 2016 (the "2016 Approval"). Because the Applicant proposes to expand the scope of the Property’s athletic complex use, the presently requested expansion of a pre-existing non-conforming use variance is governed by the criteria of N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(d)(2). 6. The Applicant’s proposal is depicted on, and otherwise supported by the following items submitted with its application: e A preliminary and final site plan set, prepared by Charles J. Stewart, P.E., P.L.S.., of E 2 Project Management, LLC, dated October 13, 2022, last revised January 31, 2023, same consisting of eight (8) sheets; © An architectural plan set, prepared by Donald R. Fiore, R.A., of Heintz & Fiore, LLC, dated August 30, 2022 without revision, same consisting of three (3) sheets; e A boundary survey, prepared by Charles J. Stewart, P.E., P.L.S.., of E 2 Project Management, LLC, dated October 13, 2022 without revision, same consisting of one (1) sheet; e A Planning Evaluation, prepared by John McDonough, L.A., ALC.P., P.P., of John McDonough Associates, LLC, dated December 23, 2022; and © Copies of prior Resolutions of Approval pertaining to the Property, under the following Application Nos. and adopted by the Board on the following dates: i. ZB-08-37, adopted December 16, 2010; ii. ZB-08-37, adopted January 17, 2013; iii. ZB-15-03, adopted April 16, 2015; and iv. AB-16-05, adopted August 18, 2016. 7. Paul Grygiel, A.I.C.P., P.P., the Township/ Board Planner, and John J. Hess, PES P.E., C.M.E., the Board Engineer (the "Board Professionals"), were duly sworn according to law. 3

Page 87

FINAL - V1 — SKW — 10.18.23 8. John P. Wyciskala, Esq., of Inglesino, Webster, Wyciskala & Taylor, LLC, having a business address of 600 Parsippany Road, Suite 204, Parsippany-Troy Hills, entered his appearance on behalf of the Applicant and provided an overview of the application, relief sought, and witnesses to be presented. 9. The Applicant offered testimony from the following witnesses who were duly sworn according to law: a. Donald R. Fiore, R.A., of Heintz & Fiore, LLC, having a business address of 508 Millburn Avenue, Short Hills; b. Charles J. Stewart, P.E., P.L.S.., of E 2 Project Management, LLC, having a business address of 87 Hibernia Avenue, Rockaway; and c. Alexander Dougherty, P.P., of John McDonough Associates, LLC, having a business address of 101 Gibraltar Drive, Suite 1A, Morris Plains. 10. Mr. Fiore, Mr. Stewart, and Mr. Dougherty provided their credentials and were accepted by the Board as experts in the fields of architecture, civil engineering, and professional planning, respectively. Testimony Offered at the June 22, 2023 Hearing 11. Mr. Fiore introduced into evidence: (i) as Exhibit A-1, a colorized rendering of the first floor of the interior of the proposed fitness center, dated June 22, 2023; and (ii) as Exhibit Ac2, a colorized rendering of the interior of the second floor of the proposed fitness center, dated June 22, 2023. 12, Mr. Fiore, in explaining the impetus behind, and general considerations of, the proposal, testified that: (i) the proposal is intended to swap the functions of the existing storage/maintenance building and southem field house on the Property; (ii) the existing storage/maintenance building was originally intended to serve as a hub for the Applicant's Property maintenance program but, currently, only a limited amount of athletic equipment is 4

Page 88

FINAL — V1 —SKW — 10.18.23 stored there; (iii) the southern field house hosts the existing weight room and fitness center, though the structure is situated relatively far from the sports fields and other amenities on the Property, making it inefficient for use by Seton Hall's athletic programs; (vi) the Applicant proposes to renovate and construct an addition to the existing maintenance/storage building and use the structure as an athletic fitness and training facility, and use the southem field house for the storage of athletic and other forms of equipment; and (v) the existing maintenance/storage building is situated about 900' from Prospect Avenue, 1250' from the nearest single-family dwellings to the south, 485' from Ridge Road, 975' from the nearest single-family residences to the north, and 820! from the northern Property line. 13. Mr. Fiore, in explaining the architectural considerations behind the proposal, testified that: (i) the existing maintenance/storage building has a 2,468 square-foot footprint and the existing southern field house has a 3,139 square-foot footprint; (ii) with the proposed addition to the existing maintenance/storage building, the structure would serve as the proposed fitness center with floor area totaling 9,596 square feet and a footprint of 7,684 square feet; (iii) the first floor of the proposed fitness center would feature a fitness/weight room, offices, restrooms, a machine room, and a janitor’s closet; (iv) the second floor of the proposed fitness center would feature, a training area, office, storage rooms, restrooms, balcony, and a janitor’s closet; (v) the proposed fitness center would feature entry and exit vestibules on its north and south facades, as well as three (3) overhead, garage-style doors on its west facade; (vi) the proposed fitness center would have two (2) stairwells, each respectively protruding from the building's north and south sides; (vii) the exterior of the proposed fitness center would feature brick veneer on the outside of its proposed stairwells, as well as metal siding and a significant amount of glazing on each facade; (viii) the proposed fitness center would be 30’ tall, as measured from the top of the

Page 89

FINAL — V1 — SKW - 10.18.23 proposed stairways, and 28' tall, as measured from the top of proposed rooftop parapets, while the existing maintenance/storage building is 21' tall; (ix) by way of relocating the athletic training activities occurring within the southern field house to the proposed fitness center, which is located to the interior of the Property, on-site activity would have less of an impact to surrounding properties than it has presently; and (x) after taking sound readings from six (6) different points around the Property, and considering the noise generated by current training activities occurring within the southem field house, he is confident that no on-site activity would exceed permissible decibel thresholds. 14. On questioning by members of the Board and Board Professionals, Mr. Fiore testified that: (i) the Applicant plans to install solar panels on the roof of the proposed fitness center but cannot commit to doing so until a design is put together, (ii) the Applicant does not, as of the June 22, 2023 hearing, propose to add any further landscaping to the Property; (iii) the proposed fitness center likely will not be visible from the residences located about 1250 south of that location; (iii) the proposed fitness center would have about 9,596 square feet of floor area; (iv) because of poor water pressure, the Applicant would likely be unable to efficiently install sustainable water appliances on-site; (v) the proposed fitness center would feature a flat roof with parapets that would effectively screen any roof-mounted HVAC equipment; (vi) the proposed fitness center would feature overhead doors only on its west facade; (vii) lawn maintenance equipment, if any, is stored in the existing storage/maintenance building and would be stored in the southern field house; (viii) the height of the backstop on the nearby baseball field would prevent any wanton baseballs from hitting the proposed fitness center's glazing; (ix) egress from the proposed fitness center would be provided via doors next to both proposed stairwells; (x) the second floor balcony of the proposed fitness center will likely host a variety of activities, but be

File revisions (1)