04_AECOM_Environmental Report_Final

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Prepared for: Mr. Jason Battcher Associate Director, Real Estate Development Wonder Group, Inc. Prepared by: Phaneendra Uppalapati Air Quality Engineer T: 216-280-8976 E: Phaneendra.Uppalapati@aecom.com AECOM 250 Apollo Drive Chelmsford, MA 01824 aecom.com Copyright © 2024 by AECOM Project number: 89735150 All rights reserved. No part of this copyrighted work may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of AECOM. AECOM

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Test Program Exceptions 1.1.1. Low Stack Gas Velocity . 1.1.2 Emission Results. 2. Summary and Discussion of Results. 2.1 Results Summary ... 2.1.1 Particulate Matter Results — Exhaust Stack. 2.1.2 Palycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons — Exhaust Stack 3. Test Program and Sampling Methodology 3.1 Overview. 3.1.1. EPA Methods 1 and 2 for Determination of Sampling Location and Cyclonic Flow.. “3 1 3.1.2 EPAMethods 3A for Determination of Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide {Instrumental Analyzer) 3.1.3 EPAMethod 4 for Determination of Moisture 3.1.4 EPAMethod 5 for Determination of Particulate Matter and EPA Method 202 for Determination of Condensable Particulate Matter. ......... 3.1.5 SW-846 Methad 0010 for Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic ‘Hydrocarbons Compounds. 4. Quality Assurance/Quality Control and Data Reporting 4.1 Pitot Tubes ..... 4.2 Thermocouples... 4.3 Dry Gas Meters .. 4.4 Field Barometer. 4.5 Field Balane 4.6 IMS Equipment and Instrumentatior 4.7 Leak Check Procedures. 5. Data Reduction Plan and Data Reporting 5.1 Overview..... 5.2 PM Emission Concentration — gr/dscef. 5.3. PAH Emission Concentration — ng/dsef. 5.4. PM Emission - lb/hr.... Appendix A Field Data Sheets . Appendix B Facility Process Data ..............ec.eccsceeceecescecceceeceeeeeeeeeeereeeeeeeeeneaes Appendix C Reference Method Calibrations ...........ceceeeeeeeseseeseeeeeeeeneeeaeeee Appendix D Analytical Reports ..........2....ceececceeceeceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeseeeeeeeeeseees Figures Figure 3-1: Schematics of Meat Smoker Exhaust Stack Sampling Location Tables Table 1-1: Performance Test Program Summary Table 2-1: Wonder Meat Smoker Stack PM Emissions Table 2-2: Wonder Meat Smoker Stack PAH Emissions .................

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 AECOM

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 1. Introduction AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) of Conshohocken, Pennsylvania was retained by Wonder Group, Inc., (Wander) ta conduct this Performance Test on one of the wood-fired Meat Smoker units located at their West Orange, New Jersey facility. Additional test program details are presented in Table 1-1. Wonder currently manages a meat smoking operation with four wood-fired units at their West Orange facility. Wonder is expanding its capacity by adding new smokers and aims to assess their emissions before they are fully approved and installed. AECOM is supporting Wonder by conducting this Performance Test to evaluate particulate matter (PM) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) emissions from one of the Meat Smokers. The data gathered from this test program will be utilized in dispersion modeling to predict the potential effects on the surrounding community. During this program, gaseous emission parameters measured from the exhaust stack included PM and PAHs as well as fixed gases, including oxygen (Oz) and carbon dioxide (CO2) diluent gases, which are required in conjunction with the emissions tested. Three (3) test runs were conducted at one of the exhaust stacks while the smoker was operated at the maximum achievable load condition. Test program participants on site included: Mr. Timothy Mierap, Mr. Charlie Thompson, Ms. Jenn Sabbak and Ms. Laura Kinsey of AECOM. Mr. Jason Bottcher and Mr. Alex Smith fram Wonder were present during the testing. Additional information is contained in the Appendices as follows: Appendix A provides reference method field data and calculations of results for the test program and Appendix B contains facility data that contains fuel feed rate. Appendix € contains reference method quality assurance and quality control data. Appendix D contains laboratory analytical results. 1.1. Test Program Exceptions 1.4.4 Low Stack Gas Velocity During the preliminary evaluation of the stack gas flow rate, it was observed that the flow rate was extremely low, as measured by bath the differential pressure gauge on the standard sampling console manometer and a high-resolution digital manometer. The readings were below 0.01 inches of water. Given the low flow rate, it is reasonable to assume that the flow is laminar and non-cyclonic since there

nometer and a high-resolution digital manometer. The readings were below 0.01 inches of water. Given the low flow rate, it is reasonable to assume that the flow is laminar and non-cyclonic since there was insufficient kinetic energy in the exhaust gas stream to create cyclonic flow. AECOM conducted sampling throughout the program based on an assumed differential pressure of 0.01 inches of water as a worst-case flow rate given that readings were known ta be less than 0.01 inches of water. 1.4.2 Emission Results Given that the differential pressure for the stack gas had been measured to be less than 0.01 inches of water, sampling was canducted at an exceptionally low flow rate. This deviation from standard conditions intraduces a potential bias in the test results, which likely results in overestimating the actual stack emissions. The low flow rate affects the accuracy and representativeness of the data, and as a result, the emissions measured during this test program are likely higher than they actually are under normal operating conditions. AECOM 141

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 Table 1-1: Performance Test Program Summary Facility Information Facility Name: Facility Address: Facility Contact: Wonder Group. Inc. 481 Eagle Rock Avenue, West Orange, NJ Mr. Jason Bottcher Measurement Paramete! Test Conditions: Title: |Associate Director, Real Estate Development E-Mail: JBottcher@wonder.com Source Information Equipment: |Wood-Fired Meat Smoker 1 : PM, PAH, O2, and COz, Maximum Achievable Load at Normal Operating Conditions Test Firm Information Test Organization: Address: Contact: AECOM Technical Services, Inc. 250 Apollo Drive, Chelmsford, MA 01824 Mr. Phaneendra K. Uppalapati Air Quality Engineer : |Phaneendra.Uppalapati@aecam.com Permit Consultant Organization: Address: Contact: Title: E-Mail: AECOM Technical Services. Inc 625 West Ridge Pike, Suite E-100, Conshohacken, PA 19428 Mr. Kevin W. Voit Manager, Air Permitting and Compliance Services Kevin. Vait@aecom.com AECOM 4-2

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 2. Summary and Discussion of Results 2.1 Results Summary This section presents a detailed summary of the PM and PAH emissions results obtained during the performance test completed for the Wonder Meat Smoker on August 6 and August 7, 2024. As previously discussed in Section 1.0, three (3) test runs were completed for the purpose of quantifying PM and PAH emissions. Performance testing was performed while the meat smoker was operating at the maximum achievable load condition while combusting wood fuel. Table 2-1 provides a summary of the emissions results for the testing program. Note that Run 2 failed the past-leak check on the Method 5/202 train. As a result, Run 2 was voided, and an additional Run 4 was conducted to collect three representative samples. The remainder of this section provides summaries of the test results for each measured parameter. 2.44 Particulate Matter Results — Exhaust Stack As shown in Table 2-1, filterable PM (FPM) concentrations in units of grains per dry standard cubic foot (gr/dsef) averaged 0.0024 gr/dsef during the emissions testing. Concurrent FPM mass emission rates averaged 0.011 pounds per hour (Ib/hr). Condensable PM (CPM) concentrations averaged 0.0035 gr/dsef during the emissions testing. Concurrent CPM mass emission rates averaged 0.016 pounds per hour {Ib/hr). Total PM (TPM) concentrations averaged 0.0058 gr/dscf during the emissions testing. TPM mass emission rates averaged 0.027 pounds per hour (lb/hr). 2.1.2 Polycyclic Aramatic Hydrocarbons — Exhaust Stack PAH concentrations for individual compounds in units of nanograms per dry standard cubic foot and mass emission rates averaged in pounds per hour (Ib/hr) are presented in Table 2-2. AECOM 241

Performance Test Report for Wood Fired Meat Smoker Project number: 89735150 Table 2-1: Wonder Meat Smoker Stack PM Emissions Run No. 1 3 4 Date 06-Aug-24 | 07-Aug-24 | 07-Aug-24 Start Time Units 11:04 7:32 10:14 Stop Time 12:27 8:50 11:24 AVGS & jing Parameters - Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.42 29.40 29.43 29.42 Volume Metered def 64.06 66.13 60.94 63.71 Volume of Gas Collected dsef 59.08 62.38 59.43 60.30 Moisture % viv 3.0 24 2.2 2.6 ©, at Stack % dry 20.23 20.16 20.21 20.20 CO; at Stack % dry 0.49 0.48 0.44 0.47 Avg. Stack Temp. °F 146 137 124 136 Stack Flowrate dsefm 537 544 551 544 lsokinatics % 101 105 99 102 ‘MS/202 Particulate Emission Results Front Half Rinse “4140 ] 171 Particulate Filter mg 3.99 11.70 8.12 7.94 Total Front-Half Particulate mg 5.64 13.78 9.52 8.65 FH Grain Loading gridsef 0.0015 0034 0.0025 0.0024 FH Emission Rate Ib/hour Back-Half Aqueous Phase mg Back-Half Organic Phase mg Back-Half Aqueous Blank Correct mg Total Back-Half Particulate mg . Total Back-Half Particulate Blank Corr. mg 23.19 7.35 13.56 BH Grain Loading gridsef BH Emission Rate Total Emission Rate AECOM 2-2

Performance Test Report far Wood Fired Meat Smoker Table 2-2: Wonder Meat Smoker Stack PAH Emissions Project number: 673! Run No. 1 2 3 Average Date 08-Aug-24 08-Aug-24 07-Aug-24 = Start Tine. 11:04 14:00 07:32 - Stop Tine 12:27 16:02 08:50 = Units Sample Volume dscf 58,565 60.349 59.738 59.55 Sample Volume ms 1.66 1.71 4.69 1.69 Moisture Content “hI 3.2 3.2 3.7 3.37 O2 Concentration % viv (dry) 20.23 20.16 20.16 20.18 CO, Concentration | % vv (dry) 0.49 0.58 0.48 0.62 Isokinetics. % ag 102 100 = Stack Flowrate dscfm 540 544 545 542 PAHs by GC/MS PAH by GC/MS ng ngim? | Ib/hr ng ngfm® Ib/hr ng ngim* o/h Average Parameters Ib/hr 2-Methylnaphthalene 7810.00 |4.71E+03| 9.52E-06 $700.00 | 3.92E+03 | 7.94E-06 29900.00 | 1.75E+04 | 3.57E-05 1 T7ERS Acenaphthene 489.00 __| 2.95E+02| 5.96E-07 273.00 | 1.60E+02 | 3.23E-07 1700.00 _| 1.00E+03 | 2.05E-05 9.90E-07 Acenaphthylene 4470.00 | 2.70E+03| 5 45E-06 2260.00 | 1.32E+03 | 2.68E-06 20400.00 | 1.21E+04 | 2.45E-05 4,09E-05 Anthracene 1440.00 | 8.48E+02] 1.76E-06 897.00 5.25E+02 | 1.06E-06 3530.00 | 2.10E+03 | 4.30E-04 2.37E-06 Benzo[ajanthracene 340.00 | 2.05E+02 | 4.15E-07 264.00 1,54E+02 | 3.13E-07 903.00 | 5.34E+02 | 1.09E-06 §,06E-07 Benzo[a]pyrene < 85.00 [5.13E+01] 1.04E-07 80.00 4,68E+01 | 9.48E-08 445.00 | 2.63E+02 | 5.37E-07 |}< 2.45E-07 Benzo[b] uoranthene : <__490.00 [2.95E+02|5.98E-07] 224.00 | 1.31E+02/ 2.65E-07|< 734.00 | 4.63E+02| 9.46E-07|[< 4.03E-07 _Benzofelpyrene <_ 85,00 |5.13E+01| 1,04E-07 “91.90 | 5.38E+01 | 1.09E-07 233,00 | 1.67E+02 | 3.41E-07 |< 1.85E-07 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene < 300.00 | 1.81E+02] 3.66E-07 ]}< 120.00 7.02E+01 | 1.42E-07 |/< 480.00 | 2.84E+02| 5.79E-07 }< — 3.82E-07 Benzo[kjfluoranthene - <_120.00 |7.24E+01| 1.466-07|< 48.00 | 2.81E+01/5.69E-08| 324.00 | 1.92E+02] 3.91E-07 |< — 1.98E-07 Chrysene . i $50.00 |3.32E+02]6.71E-07] 424.00 | 2.48E+02 | 5.02E-07 1479.00 | 8.89E+02 | 1.77E-08 9,82E-07 __Dibenz(a,hjanthracene S__135.00 | 8.14E +01} 1.65E-07 | < 54.00 3.16E+01 <___216.00 1,.28E+02 | 2.61E-07 |< 1.83E-07 _ Fluoranthene 3020.00 | 1.82E+03| 3.68E-06 1780,00 | 1,03E+03 5330.00 _| 3.15E+03 | 3.43E-05 4.07E-06 Fluorene 2610.00 | 1.57E+03| 3.18E-06 1590.00 | 9.30E+02 | $920.00 | 4.09E +03 | 8.35E-08 4.47E-08 ven dNGen oft 2,3-CS)pyrene af San 99:00... |S: 73E 201] 1:46E-07] 40.70 | 2.386401. won 237,00 | 1-40E+02 | 2.86E-07 |< 1,50E-07__ Naphthalene 42400 | 2.53E+04 |

20.00 | 4.09E +03 | 8.35E-08 4.47E-08 ven dNGen oft 2,3-CS)pyrene af San 99:00... |S: 73E 201] 1:46E-07] 40.70 | 2.386401. won 237,00 | 1-40E+02 | 2.86E-07 |< 1,50E-07__ Naphthalene 42400 | 2.53E+04 | 5.17E-05 $2100 1,88E+04 141000 | 8.34E+04 | 1.70E-04 8.35E-05 Perylene <__ 55.00 | 3.32E+01] 6.71E-08}< 22.00 1,29E+01 <___38.00 §.20E+01 | 1.05E-07 /< — 6.54E-03 Phenanthrene. 41000.00 | 6.53E+03] 1.34E-05 $300.00 | 3.68E+03 419200.00 | 1.14E+04 | 2.32E-05 4 ATEAS Pyrene 2290.00 | 1.38E+03] 2.79E-06 1420.00 | 8.31E+02 4710.00 | 2.78E+03 | 5.68E-06 3,.39E-06 Note: <- Value reported at MDL AECO 2 M -3